VIDEO: Chelsea talisman Cole Palmer links up with UK rap sensation Central Cee to watch Drake live in Manchester

For the first time since 2019, global hip-hop icon Drake made his long-awaited return to the Manchester stage, and Cole Palmer did not miss the opportunity to watch him live. The Chelsea forward traced his way to Co-Op Live on Friday night and was accompanied by another celebrity guest, Central Cee.

Palmer attended Drake's concert in ManchesterForward enjoying his break after lifting the CWC trophyWill be back for pre-season in AugustFollow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱WHAT HAPPENED?

Launching the night with his track the Canadian superstar took the stage in a casual blue button-down shirt paired with brown jeans. Before delving into his set, he greeted the packed arena with a shoutout to his most loyal fans: "Where my Day Ones at?" and the audience roared in response, welcoming him back with overwhelming energy, with Palmer and Cee in the crowd.

AdvertisementWATCH THE CLIPTHE BIGGER PICTURE

The timing of Drake’s Manchester concert series aligned perfectly with the release of a new joint track with Central Cee titled Which One. Premiered on an episode of Drake’s Iceman streaming series—filmed in various locations around Manchester—the song adds another chapter to their growing collaborative history. And surprisingly, the crowd was treated to a thrilling moment when Drake invited Central Cee on stage for a live rendition of the track. Drake was effusive in his praise for Central Cee and said, "I'm so proud of this guy. He's going around the world, killing it, shutting down every show, record after record."

ENJOYED THIS STORY?

Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

Getty Images SportWHAT NEXT FOR PALMER?

Palmer is soaking in the post-season vibes following his Club World Cup triumph with Chelsea in the United States. However, with Chelsea looking to reassert themselves on the European stage once again next season, with a Champions League return sealed, the England international will be critical to their ambitions. He is expected to return to Cobham for pre-season in the first week of August.

Denly, Bell-Drummond tons shut door on Somerset

Kent overcome second-innings wobble as seasoned pair bat out to secure draw

ECB Reporters Network08-Apr-2024Joe Denly and Daniel Bell-Drummond both hit centuries as Kent survived a mid-morning scare to earn a draw with Somerset in the Vitality County Championship at Canterbury.Kent were in trouble on 10 for 2 and again at 70 for 3, until a partnership of 222 for the fourth wicket took the sting out of the contest and they closed on 290 for 4 declared. Denly beat his partner to three figures, posting 110 from 142 balls including 11 fours and a six, while Bell-Drummond made 107 not out from 169, with 14 fours.Earlier Kasey Aldridge hit 57 before Somerset were bowled out for 403, a lead of 119. Nathan Gilchrist had Kent’s best bowling figures with 3 for 64.The draw was the clear favourite at the start of day four and one “win predictor” app claimed Kent’s chances of winning were precisely zero. Certainly if any side had a realistic chance it was the visitors.Somerset resumed on 374 for 7 and immediately went on the attack. Aldridge, who was on 50 overnight, drove the first ball of the day for four before he was brilliantly caught at midwicket by Jack Leaning off Gilchrist. Bell-Drummond then ran out Ned Leonard for 1, throwing down the stumps from short mid-on.Jake Ball hit his first ball as a Somerset player for a six into the lower Frank Woolley Stand and a fourth batting point was secured when Josh Davey flicked Wes Agar to third man for a single, but the innings was wrapped up when Ball played on to Gilchrist.Somerset clearly felt they had a chance as their batters sprinted for the dressing room and the more nervous home supporters were soon worried. Kent had a minimum 87 overs to navigate and lost both openers in the first five. Ben Compton went in the fourth, strangled by Ball to a delivery he clearly didn’t think he’d hit and Tawanda Muyeye then swatted Davey to Tom Banton at point.Bell-Drummond and Jack Leaning calmed the situation by batting though till lunch, at which point it was 68 for 2.Somerset’s hopes soared again when Leaning perished in the second over of the afternoon, bowled by Lewis Goldsworthy for 32, but Denly joined Bell-Drummond and quickly wiped out the deficit.Denly, who had also scored a century in his last red-ball innings for Kent in the final game of the 2023 season, clearly felt attack was the best form of defence. He raced to 50 from 53 balls, bringing up his half-century when he glanced Lewis Gregory for four.Bell-Drummond passed the same landmark when he took a single from the same bowler and by tea it was 228 for 2. The tension had subsided and as one observer put it: “I’ve never been so delighted to be bored.”Denly’s century arrived with arguably his worst shot of the day, an edge for two off Goldsworthy that flew over the slips and Bell-Drummond’s followed soon afterwards, when he hit Goldsworthy back over his head for four.Denly was out in the final over when he edged Goldsworthy to Matt Renshaw in the slips, but with any hopes of a win for either side long gone, Kent declared at 4.50pm and the teams shook hands on a draw. Somerset take 15 points and Kent 12.

Ruben Amorim gives his verdict on Man Utd's goalkeepers amid talk of interest in Emi Martinez

Manchester United boss Ruben Amorim gave his verdict on the current batch of goalkeepers at Old Trafford amid sustained interest in Argentine star Emiliano Martinez. The Red Devils recently approached Aston Villa with a proposal to secure Martinez on loan, but the inquiry was swiftly turned down by the Midlands outfit.

United are looking for a new No.1 Andre Onana on shaky grounds Amorim addressed Martinez pursuit Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱WHAT HAPPENED?

Andre Onana has made several crucial mistakes since he joined United, which has forced the club hierarchy to dip into the market once again in search of a new No.1. Moreover, the Cameroonian picked up an injury in July, which further led Amorim to knock on Villa's door with the hope of securing Martinez. However, the former Inter shotstopper has been working his way back to fitness, and his presence will be a welcome boost as preparations for the new campaign ramp up.     

AdvertisementGetty ImagesWHAT AMORIM SAID

When asked if a new keeper will be added to the roster in the summer, Amorim said: "We are always looking to improve the team. And we have some characteristics that we would like to have. But again, it depends on the market. It depends on the sales. We'll see. But I'm really happy. And I think even when you talk about Andre, you can see the goalkeepers. Even Tom (Heaton) is learner, he's a different goalkeeper. Altay (Bayindir) did really well, and Onana is going to be better like the other guys that are getting better this year."  

THE BIGGER PICTURE

Apart from scouring the market for a keeper, they are also keen to sign a striker. And one key name currently linked with a move to Old Trafford is RB Leipzig forward Benjamin Sesko. The officials are reportedly deep in negotiations and believe they are in a strong position to agree terms for the highly rated striker. The club hope to finalise this signing before offloading members of their so-called “bomb squad”, which includes Jadon Sancho, Antony, and Tyrell Malacia.   

ENJOYED THIS STORY?

Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

Getty/GOALWHAT NEXT FOR MANCHESTER UNITED?

The pressure is on the club’s hierarchy to deliver the players Amorim is seeking before the September 1 deadline. Whether or not they manage to land targets like Sesko or bolster the goalkeeping department further, the next few weeks will be crucial in determining how competitive United will be in the months ahead.  

Tight Ashes Tests

A look back to ten of the closest finishes between cricket’s oldest rivals, England and Australia

Will Luke11-Aug-2005

Bob Willis’s staggering 8 for 43 is often overshadowed by Ian Botham’s performance, in the famous Headingley ’81 Test © Getty Images

Sixth Test, 1997, The Oval
“Too late to rescue the Ashes, but not too late to rescue their self-respect,” said Wisden of the sixth and final Test in the 1997 series. Despite winning the first Test, convincingly, England were overwhelmed by the Antipodeans in the remainder of the series; the Ashes were lost and so, it appeared, were England. The recall of Phil Tufnell proved inspired. He decimated a batting lineup which had been so fiercely dominant throughout the series, taking 11 wickets in the match. Set just 124 runs to win, Tufnell and Caddick tore into Australia, to at last defy Australia by 19 runs, and momentarily restore English cricket’s wobbling status.
Third Test, 1981, Headingley
Headingley, 1981; the biggest pinch in Ashes history. On the fourth day, following on, England creaked to 135 for 7 and Ladbrokes, famously, offered odds of 500-1 against them. They hadn’t, however, wagered on Ian Botham and Bob Willis producing runs and wickets as though their lives depended on it. Willis’s 8 for 43 was the most staggering performance of his life, as he matched Botham’s nation-binding efforts a few hours previously. Australia only needed 130 to win, yet fell short by just 18 runs to square the series. The similarities between this and Edgbaston last Sunday are obvious yet spine-tingling in their resonance.First Test, 1886-87, Sydney
In 1887, only five years after it all began, one of the first classic Ashes matches took place in Sydney. Put into bat by Percy “Greatheart” McDonnell, England were devastated by Charles Turner’s fast-medium off-breaks. Indeed, Turner’s nickname, “The Terror,” was perfectly apt for this match as he bowled England out for just 45, which remains England’s lowest Test score. They faired slightly better in the second innings but, even despite the last three wickets extending England’s lead to 111, Australia were firm favourites going into day three. Billy Barnes had other ideas, though, taking 6 for 28 from 46 overs, of which, astonishingly, 29 were maidens. Ably supported by Surrey’s George Lohmann, playing in only his fourth Test, England scraped home by 13 runs.

A brilliant century on debut for Archie Jackson wasn’t enough for Australia in 1929 © Cricinfo Ltd.
Fourth Test, 1928-29, Adelaide
England had already won the Ashes come the fourth Test in the 1928-29 series. Yet, as Wisden commented, “they did not exhibit any lack of keenness.” Wally Hammond was instrumental, striking a hundred in each innings and taking his run aggregate to 851 runs in four matches. Australia were indebted to Archie Jackson, who struck the ball sweetly to score a hundred on debut. His innings was, as described by Wisden, “in point of style and beauty of execution and strokeplay, the best innings played against the Englishmen during the whole tour.” Brilliant though Jackson was, Australia stumbled in their second innings. At the start of seventh day of the match, 89 runs were required and the Don was still at the crease. But his wicket, a cruel run-out, signalled the end for Australia and England crept home by 12 runs.Fourth Test, 1998-99, Melbourne
Widely pilloried before the fourth Test of the 1998-99 series, England responded with heart and never let Australia get too far away. England’s talisman of the 1990s, Darren Gough, restricted Australia’s run-machines to a relatively modest 340 in their first innings. Yet, despite Alec Stewart’s second bolshy half-century in the match, Australia’s target of 175 was seemingly none too tricky. Dean Headley – wicketless in the first innings – bowled with a demonic possession to take 6 for 60, to banish all suggestions of a 5-0 Ashes whitewash. The catalyst of Headley’s inspirational spell was Mark Ramprakash’s catch to dismiss Langer, who was well set on 30 – a spectacular diving effort from a vicious pull shot. Headley scented an unlikely upset and, cheered on by a particularly barmy Barmy Army, bowled with pace and hostility to produce a mini-spell of four for four in 13 balls. The last three Australian batsmen only lasted three balls, two falling to Gough whose tribal-dance celebrations demonstrated the importance of a rare victory on Australian soil, by just 12 runs.

Jack Blackham’s 74 wasn’t enough to defy England a famous victory in 1894 © ACB
First Test, 1894-95, Sydney
One of the strangest Ashes turnabouts of all time occurred in 1894 at the SCG. Choosing to bat, Australia compiled a mammoth score of 586, with Syd Gregory making a career-best 201. The captain, Jack Blackham at No. 10, who was playing in his final Test, also hit a career-best 74 and together with Gregory hit a record ninth-wicket partnership of 154 in just an hour-and-a-quarter. England’s first-innings reply was feeble, but they followed on to place unanticipated pressure on Australia in the fourth innings, as overnight rain turned the pitch into a quagmire. On the fifth evening, Australia only required a further 64 runs to win. Indeed, several of England’s players had thought the match lost and relaxed accordingly, including Bobby Peel. Stoddard was having none of this defeatist talk, and ordered Peel under a cold shower. It had the desired effect: he ran through Australia’s batting on the sixth day, taking 6 for 67, to carry England through to a brilliant victory by just 10 runs.Third Test, 1884-85, Sydney
With England leading the 1884-85 series 2-0, Australia needed a convincing performance in the third to claw back their chances of a series victory. They managed it, albeit in nail-biting fashion. Choosing to bat first, Australia came unstuck at the hands of Wilfred Flowers who took five wickets in their first innings, dismissing them for just 181. England fared even worse in reply, however, with Flowers top-scoring with 24. Set 214 to win, England were unlucky with the weather – a hailstorm had enlivened the pitch, and Fred “The Demon” Spofforth ran riot, taking 6 for 60, including the key wicket of Arthur Shrewsbury. With just seven runs needed for England to win, brilliance was needed – and Edwin Evans provided it with a remarkable catch at point, to dismiss England’s allrounder Flowers and win the game for Australia by six runsOnly Test, 1882, The Oval
The one that fuelled the Ashes. In the only Test of 1882, England’s infamous loss to Australia gave birth to the Ashes itself. Fred “The Demon” Spofforth’s 14 wickets cut a swathe through England’s batting in both innings. They only required 85 to win, in a low-scoring classic, but fell short by seven runs. Such was the game’s drama and intensity that one spectator died of heart failure, and another bit through his umbrella handle. We know the feeling.

Hugh Trumble’s deadly off-spin was the catalyst for Australia in their four-run victory in 1902 © The Cricketer International
Fourth Test, 1902, Manchester
A blistering 104 from Victor Trumper, and deadly bowling from Hugh Trumble were the catalysts for one of Australia’s most famous victories over England, in 1902 at Old Trafford. Trumper’s remarkable hundred came before lunch, in 115 minutes, as Australia compiled 299. They were restricted by brilliant bowling from Bill Lockwood, who was delayed from bowling due to slippery footholes, who ended with 6 for 48. England fell 37 runs short in their first innings, but another inspired spell by Lockwood, who took 5 for 28, caused Australia to collapse to 86 all out, setting England a target of 124. Steady wickets fell to both Trumble and Saunders and, with eight runs needed and the last pair at the wicket, a sudden downpour brought play to a dramatic pause. After the delay, Fred Tate poked Saunders for four. Four more for victory. Saunders bowled a faster ball, to outfox Tate’s defence, and Australia were victors by just four runs.Second Test, 2005, Edgbaston
In a match which will surely be known as “Flintoff’s Test,” once the dust settles on this year’s Ashes, England had everything to gain, and everything to lose. Their grease-lightning innings on the first day – 407 all out – was nearly matched by Australia, who fell 99 runs short. The success was short-lived, however, as Shane Warne reminded everyone of his enduring brilliance, skittling England’s top-order with six wickets. Everyone, that is, but Flintoff. His thrilling 73 was, by 50 runs, England’s highest score – and the manner in which it was attained, with muscular sixes and scythed fours, brought a partisan crowd alive. And by taking eight of Australia’s second-innings wickets, on only day three, England waltzed into their dressing-room confident and expectant of victory. Day four produced an impossibly exciting finale, as Australia’s tail-enders seized the initiative and edged ever closer to their target. With three runs still needed, Steve Harmison bounced Mike Kasprowicz, found the glove, and the much-maligned keeper, Geraint Jones, took the most important catch of his life.

The same XI, and the most balls without a wicket

The regular Monday column in which Steven Lynch answers your questions about (almost) any aspect of cricket

Steven Lynch13-Aug-2007The regular Monday column in which Steven Lynch answers your questions about (almost) any aspect of cricket:

Both India and England fielded unchanged sides thorugh the three-Test series, the first time this has happened in cricket history © Getty Images
I have noticed that both England and India were unchanged during the current series. Is this some kind of a record? asked Arun Batra from Canada
Both England and India used the same 11 players throughout this summer’s three-Test series, the first time this has happened in Test history. There are 18 previous instances of one team going unchanged through a three-Test rubber, but never both sides in the same one. There are also two instances of it happening in a four-Test series, and three in a five-Test rubber: for the full list, click here.Who has bowled the most deliveries in Tests and ODIs without taking a wicket? asked Mandeep Basi from Canada
In Tests the bowler who delivered the most fruitless balls was the Lancashire and England allrounder Len Hopwood, who sent down 462 in his two Tests against Australia in 1934 without managing a wicket. In second place, rather surprisingly, is the West Indian batting legend George Headley (398 balls in 22 Tests). In ODIs the leader (if that’s the right word) is the Sri Lankan Athula Samarasekera, who delivered 338 balls without taking a wicket.Someone told me that in the last Under-19 World Cup final, one of the teams was 9 for 6 before lunch! Is this true? asked Karn Sohal
It is true – and what’s more the team batting first had already been out! The match was played in Colombo in February 2006, and India must have fancied their chances of dethroning the defending champions Pakistan after bowling them out for 109. Pakistan’s innings lasted only 41.1 of the scheduled 50 overs, leaving some time before the scheduled dinner break (it was a day/night game). But India subsided to 9 for 6, at which point the players took their break. India regrouped afterwards – but not enough, being bowled out for 71.A long time ago my father told me that an Australian player once bowled two consecutive overs against England. My friend doesn’t believe this. Is it true? And are there any other instances of a bowler bowling two consecutive overs? asked Aaron Liong from Australia
The incident you’re talking about happened during the fourth Test of the 1921 Ashes series, at Old Trafford. The England captain Lionel Tennyson tried to declare late on the second day of the scheduled three-day match – but the first day had been washed out, and Australia’s captain Warwick Armstrong pointed out a complicated rule in force at the time, which prevented a declaration in a two-day game (which the match had become) unless the side batting second had at least 100 minutes to bat that evening. Around 25 minutes were lost while the captains and umpires debated the issue, and when the England innings eventually resumed Armstrong bowled the first over, having also delivered the last one before the attempted closure. Armstrong never divulged whether he had done this deliberately, although his biographer Gideon Haigh suspects that he liked people to think that it was. The only other documented instance of this happening in a Test occurred against England at Wellington in 1950-51, when the New Zealand legspinner Alex Moir bowled the last over before tea on the fourth day and the first one afterwards.

Michael Vaughan: eighth on the list of England’s centurions © Getty Images
I noticed Michael Vaughan scored his 17th Test century against India. How many English batsmen have scored more than Yorkshire’s old horse?asked Brendan from Australia
Only seven batsmen have scored more Test centuries for England than Michael Vaughan’s 17, as this list shows. Geoff Boycott, Colin Cowdrey and Wally Hammond lead the way with 22, ahead of Ken Barrington and Graham Gooch (both 20), Len Hutton (19), and David Gower (18).I recently received Peter Roebuck’s book Great Innings for my birthday. In it there’s a quote that he attributes to SF Barnes, talking about Jack Hobbs: “Sometimes I’d just plug them down and hope he had a fit or something.” Given how little first-class cricket Barnes played (and that his only full county seasons predated Hobbs’s career), I find this doubtful. Did Barnes and Hobbs ever play on opposing sides in a first-class match? asked George Miller
Well, you’re right in one respect – as far as I can see, those two greats Jack Hobbs and Sydney Barnes were never on opposite sides in the same first-class match. But the quote (which I can’t trace) may well still be accurate: Hobbs and Barnes did face each other at least once, in a wartime match between Saltaire and Idle in the Yorkshire League’s Priestley Cup in July 1917. Leslie Duckworth was there, and recalls in his Barnes biography Master Bowler: “It provided a battle of skill and wits between the greatest bowler and one of the greatest batsmen of all time. Hobbs had the best of it on this occasion, and for years I carried an impression that he more than once hit Barnes out of the ground on to the roofs of adjoining houses and once through a bedroom window.” Elsewhere he mentions what may have been the same match: “I saw a great deal of Barnes in action against some of the finest batsmen in the land, including a wonderful day when Jack Hobbs hit 132, with 20 fours – 117 before the first wicket fell – and Barnes’s face got blacker and blacker.” In another part of the book Duckworth writes that “Barnes always used to say that Hobbs was the greatest batsman he ever bowled against”.

The cash in the cash cow

The IPL franchisees are paying big money for the privilege of owning teams, but they’re not going to be seeing any returns for five years at least. A look at the economics of the league

Ashok Malik11-Feb-2008

Franchise owners like Vijay Mallya will be looking at using the cricket property to promote their other businesses, and as a publicity vehicle © AFP
In the mid-1990s, in the first flush of economic liberalisation, the government of India opened up the telecom business. From a state monopoly, private players were now invited to bid for the right to provide basic and mobile telephony in specified circles.Fantastic figures were quoted. New telecom companies emerged out of thin air. Some were owned by well-known business houses, others by supposed friends of the telecom minister. Everybody was giddy with excitement, but sitting prettiest was the government. It had been promised huge licence fees – and had, essentially, made its millions without lifting a finger.For the winners of the tendering process, life was less simple. The questions began to roll in thick and fast. Would private telephony be an upper-end service or a mass market one? Would some consumers pay lots of money to make a call, or would charging lots of consumers a fraction be a better business model? How many cell phones would Indians buy, how often, and what prices?A decade and a bit down the line, the big boys of telecom have become valuable and profitable. Companies and licences have been re-sold; consolidation has sifted the serious players from the dilettante investors. Telecom is one of the key drivers of the Indian economy.In 1995, however, it was the great unknown. That’s exactly what the Indian Premier League is today. Many suspect that a domestic Twenty20 league, with all the attendant razzmatazz, will ultimately come out successful. Yet nobody is betting on specific numbers, on time-frames and on modalities.The ones with the least to lose are the gentlemen at the BCCI. Legally, the IPL is a sub-committee of the BCCI, and it has already guaranteed itself close to $1.75 billion in television rights and franchise sales figures. The title sponsorship for the inaugural IPL tournament, and the commission from the player auctions – each of the eight franchise teams can “buy” up to four foreign cricketers through IPL – will earn it more. Of course, two-thirds (64 per cent, to be precise) of the central rights money – television and title sponsorship, for example – will have to be shared with the franchisees/clubs. Even so, by the simple expedient of sanctioning a new product, Twenty20 cricket, the BCCI/IPL has earned the cheapest billion in Indian history. Like the telecom ministry in 1995, it is laughing its way to the bank.Twenty20 (tele)-vision
Is anybody else laughing? Not quite. The franchisees are alternating between grinning and grimacing. The media-rights winner, WSG/Sony Entertainment Television, is frowning. Why? Simply because, however you look at it, for the next three to five years IPL commitments seem unlikely to make money.Consider the television deal. WSG has promised IPL about $350 million for the first five years and a little over $550 million for the following five years. As such, in the first year WSG is committed to paying IPL $70 million (or, at Rs 40 to a dollar, Rs 280 crore). How much can Sony recover from advertisers? Let’s go by industry benchmarks. ESPN Star Sports holds the telecast rights for the current Indian tour of Australia. According to a company executive, for four Test matches, one Twenty20 game and 14 one-day internationals – involving a three-team league and at least two finals – ESPN Star Sports has earned some $ 81 million in ad revenue. About $19 million has come from the Test series, and $62 million from the limited-overs segment.Do note that the current season is cricket’s equivalent of a blockbuster. A star-studded Indian team is playing the world’s best Test side and the two World Cup finalists. ESPN Star Sports wouldn’t have earned so much if India had been playing Bangladesh and West Indies.Industry insiders say Sony’s initial rate card for IPL matches is offering advertisers a 30-second spot for about $16,500. There are 60 such spots in a Twenty20 game, and in its first season IPL will see 59 games. That means Sony is looking at just under $60 million from ad revenues.$16,500 per spot is, it must be pointed out, a top-of-the-line rate – the sort advertisers pay for an India-Pakistan tournament final or an India-Australia Twenty20 face-off. For IPL, Sony will almost certainly have to negotiate cheaper bulk deals. One sportscaster executive points out that in the first season Sony should be happy with even about $37.5 million. The chief of a sports management company is more optimistic: “The prime-time exposure, the overall excitement around Twenty20 in general and IPL in particular, the predictability of continued viewer interest, all add up to a substantial value package for advertisers.” That aside, he argues IPL will “expand cricket’s core consumer group: attract younger audiences, more female consumers”. The bigger conflict could be four or five years away. the franchisees could be pouring in money but not recovering a modicum, and be getting tired of being treated as second-class citizens in cricket’s universe. A question could well be asked: “Why should our IPL clubs play second fiddle, in terms of scheduling and branding, to international cricket? We’re putting in good money; the cricket boards owe us something, surely?”That could be right. The first season of IPL is likely to be more extravaganza than pure sport, whatever that may mean in cricket’s hedonistic age. Shows by movie actors (maybe Shahrukh Khan and Juhi Chawla performing mid-field just before their Kolkata team comes out to bat); fashion shows in between innings; a draw of lots that has lucky ticket-holders invited to the pitch, and perhaps to a party with the teams later on – the possibilities are limitless.Franchise fix
How do the eight franchisees see the balance sheet for the first year? From Reliance industries, which forked out $11 million for the Mumbai franchise, to Red Chillies (Shahrukh Khan) in Kolkata ($7.5 million), the eight clubs will pay the BCCI a hefty fee for year one. Further, bidders estimate that another $12.5 million will have to be spent on buying players and running and building up the team.Where will the earnings come from? Sixty-four per cent of the media and central rights earnings will be equally divided among the eight teams. In the case of the WSG/Sony deal with IPL, this comes to 64 per cent of $70 million – or about $5.5 million per team. The title sponsorship will bring more to the kitty.Ticket sales, says a franchise executive, could bring in $1.5 to $2 million. Individual clubs will be able to do city-specific deals for team sponsorship and sell a designated slice of in-stadia advertising that could together earn them about another $1.75 million.There could also be some earnings from corporate hospitality services: selling prime seats and boxes to upper-end audiences, throwing in drinks and dinner and a meeting with the players/entertainers.Merchandising and licensing are other options. Would people buy Red Chillies-Kolkata Tigers T-shirts or eat at Reliance Mumbai Warriors restaurants? Again, one top sports agent is very optimistic: “Licensing seems to have reached an inflexion point in India. And with the degree of passion that cricket and the teams can generate, we believe that licensing can be a substantial revenue stream.”Nevertheless, one former cricket administrator who has been offered the CEO’s job at one of the franchises says that teams should expect to lose in the region of $30 to $37 million over the first five years.”By the end of the third year, some of the franchises could also be budgeting for a new stadium. For the first year, IPL teams will be renting stadia from their state or city cricket associations. “To deliver a quality product to audiences, from family picnic spots near the playing area to food courts and clean toilets,” says a franchise executive, “we will need absolute control of the stadium.”How easy will this be? At some point, would it be worth building a new stadium as part of a multi-event entertainment centre, with conference facilities, restaurants, shopping malls and movie theatres thrown in? The Reliance Industries special economic zone in Mumbai is planned as virtually a new city. GMR, the Delhi franchisee, is redeveloping Delhi’s airport and has plans for ten hotels and entertainment zones in the environs. Could a spiffy Twenty20 cricket stadium make the cut?Land prices vary from city to city, but building a new cricket facility in India costs about $45 million, says a BCCI official. At least some of the franchisees will have to factor in that cost.Show me the money
In Delhi, speculation has already begun as to whether a senior Union minister’s son will be signed on as one of the local franchise’s four “junior cricketers”. The speculation, it must be emphasised, has little to do with the young man’s talent. It is about the political leverage it could give the corporate house backing the franchise. In the end, this may only be idle gossip in a cynical city. Yet it does explain that the motivations of the franchise owners could be very different from those of conventional businessmen – and from the expectations of cricket fans, who might wonder why so much is being invested in an untried format.There are, essentially, three reasons for the bidders to put in the sort of money they are going to have to: to make a sports team a profitable business; to use the cricket property to promote other businesses and as a publicity vehicle; to build the brand and enhance its valuation and then sell. “The individual team owner’s perspective on expenses would vary depending on the weightage given to each objective,” a sports management firm’s CEO points out.

Cricketers such as Shane Warne will fetch top dollar – and the IPL will earn a commission on every such transaction © Brand Rapport
For instance, Vijay Mallya (United Breweries, the Bangalore franchise holder) is clearly looking at the second template. From making Kingfisher Airlines the official carrier of the Bangalore team, to using Kingfisher swimsuit calendar models and his racehorses as magnets to draw crowds to an evening’s Twenty20 entertainment where Kingfisher will be the beverage of choice, there is much he can do.At least two of the smaller franchisees, one in the east and one in the north, are already talking of enhancing valuation and selling the franchise at a healthy profit. Resale is permitted after three years. In fact, an international media investor is said to be the “valuation brain” supporting three of the smaller franchises, even if the official owners are marquee names.ICC versus IPL?
At the height of the Harbhajan Singh-Andrew Symonds controversy, a senior BCCI official said, “In five years we won’t need them [the ICC]. IPL will possibly have bigger valuations than ICC.” Was it an off-the-cuff remark or was there method in that moment of madness? To put the query another way: will IPL expand the cricket economy or will it cannibalise the current market, eat into the revenues of conventional ODIs and – heresy – Test cricket? Industry observers discount these fears but few are willing to entirely dismiss them.Even so, one potential problem that IPL bigwigs are content to sweep under the carpet is of how India’s Twenty20 league can fit into the existing ICC calendar. This year, the IPL will be played starting mid-April, the off season in India. Yet it will clash almost directly with Australia’s tours of Pakistan and the West Indies, and New Zealand’s series in England.Already the buzz is that senior cricketers in Australia would rather play the IPL, and make maybe half a million dollars for a few weeks of work, than travel to troubled Pakistan or even play a series at neutral venues. New Zealand lost Shane Bond to the rebel Indian Cricket League; the bigger, wealthier IPL could have top international cricketers rethinking their priorities, particularly towards the end of their careers. A short, lucrative stint with the IPL may seem a better idea than the usual Test/ODI grind.The bigger conflict could be four or five years away. By then the IPL franchisees could be doing one of two things. First, they could be running profitable cricket ventures that could be making money or simply be subsidised by the publicity budget of the larger business house that owns the franchise. Alternatively, the franchisees could be pouring in money but not recovering a modicum, and be getting tired of being treated as second-class citizens in cricket’s universe. A question could well be asked: “Why should our IPL clubs play second fiddle, in terms of scheduling and branding, to international cricket? We’re putting in good money; the cricket boards owe us something, surely?”Mature sports markets have faced this dilemma. English football, where the national squad is far less than the sum of the Premier League teams, is a case in point. Only this January, the FIFA president, Sepp Blatter, exclaimed, “Look at the big clubs in the Premier League … it is not the English or British game that is represented. The clubs are international XIs … But this does not serve football. To serve football, you must never forget the national team.” The men who run Manchester United and Arsenal will probably disagree. So will investors who have bought equity in these clubs. In five years or so, a little after the 2011 ICC World Cup is played in the subcontinent, Indian cricket and the BCCI, IPL and its franchises, may have to confront similar conundrums.

Bowlers shine as Pro20 rocks on

Ken Borland reviews the Standard Bank Pro20 season

Ken Borland26-Apr-2008
Ethy Mbhalati’s method of hitting the deck hard and getting steepling bounce made him the second-most successful bowler in the competition, behind the Cobras’ Charl Langeveldt © Cricinfo Ltd.
The Dolphins and Titans capped another successful Standard Bank Pro20 season at Kingsmead last night and the competition continues to set the benchmark for domestic cricket.Despite being shoved to the fag-end of the season, the Pro20 still managed to capture the imagination of South African cricket fans like no other and the Titans emerged as the winners, making sure they did not waste the services of their returning international stars. The men from the coast were the surprise packages of the tournament and, although the Dolphins often won “ugly”, their combination of superb bowling and gritty batting almost took them all the way.Being scheduled for April could have been awkward for the Pro20, but the success of the format allowed it to overcome the absence of the South African stars until the knockout rounds, cold weather in the evenings and the competing attractions of the Super 14 rugby and even the Indian Premier League, which has borrowed many of the ideas used in the local Pro20 competition. But the fact that Friday night’s final was played in front of a full house in Durban and there were close-to-capacity crowds at the semi-finals at Kingsmead and Newlands augurs well for the continued success of the Pro20.Batsmen, however, did not enjoy the same amount of success in this year’s competition as in previous seasons. Bowlers, having tasted remorseless punishment in the first four seasons of Pro20, enjoyed a much better campaign as the batsmen’s crown slipped somewhat. After four seasons of steady growth in the average total – 143 in the first season in 2003-04, followed by 148, 152 and then up to 165 last season – the average score plummeted to 134 in 2008.It would seem the bowlers have really stepped up their skills, although only the first two competitions were staged so late in the season, bringing into play worn out pitches and more movement due to cooler climatic conditions.The Cape Cobras dominated the round-robin stage with an unbeaten run of five wins and one no result but, perhaps distracted by the controversy surrounding their decision not to call up Jacques Kallis and Mark Boucher, they suffered defeat for the first time in the semi-finals when the Titans beat them in Cape Town.The Titans batsmen were unusually flaky in this season’s Pro20, but the one area the northern Gautengers excelled in, in a competition dominated by the ball, was bowling. There was no better balanced attack in the competition: if Ethy Mbhalati struck more often than not with the new ball, Albie Morkel gave nothing away with his seamers,and the spinners took control as well. Left-arm spinner Roelof van der Merwe was undoubtedly the find of the competition, bringing a no-fear approach to both bowling and batting. Mbhalati’s method of hitting the deck hard and getting steepling bounce made him the second-most successful bowler in the competition, behind the Cobras’ Charl Langeveldt, whose phenomenal season highlighted what a loss he will be if he heads for northern climes. The pair took the first two hat-tricks in the competition’s history, just two days apart.Garnett Kruger was the other outstanding fast bowler in the competition, but the Highveld Lions wasted his superb efforts, winning just one of their six matches. Loots Bosman was once again the leading batsman, although the Eagles lost out to the Dolphins at the semi-final stage.KwaZulu-Natal, the province hit hardest by defections to the Indian Cricket League, had a largely young, inexperienced side as a result. But they had some aces in the deck in the form of left-arm seamer Yusuf Abdullah, skilful seamer Johann Louw and tenacious batsman Pierre de Bruyn. And, of course, not forgetting Daryn Smit, who had his hands full supplying vital lower-order runs, keeping wicket and being one of the most successful spinners in the competition.Apart from amping up the sportainment aspects of the competition with pimped up transport for mascot Hardy, installing bigger dunk tanks and DJ booths and introducing dancers for the first time in all domestic matches, Standard Bank also added another unique feature to their highly successful sponsorship. Marketing the competition on social digital media platforms was added as the Pro20 enjoyed a formidable presence in cyberspace, with Facebook, standardbank.mobi. MXit and Twitter added to the chain of sponsorship levers.With Jonty Rhodes’ live blogs proving almost as popular as the wonderfully cheap ticket prices, the Pro20 is the one domestic competition that is certainly not limping along. Even older generation traditionalists must surely now approve as the initial shock has worn off.

Haddin delivers under pressure

It was an innings full of fortune and flair, bravado and borrowed time, but most importantly for Brad Haddin it was an innings crammed with runs

Brydon Coverdale at the Adelaide Oval30-Nov-2008
Brad Haddin took seven months as a Test player to reach his first century, and then ensured it was a big one © Getty Images(file photo)
Brad Haddin has been adamant that he wants to leave his own mark on the Test team instead of trying to copy his unique predecessor Adam Gilchrist. Eight unremarkable appearances into his career his mark was threatening to become a blot but his 169 in Adelaide has confirmed him as Australia’s wicketkeeper of the future.It was an innings full of fortune and flair, bravado and borrowed time, but most importantly for Haddin it was an innings crammed with runs. No Australian had made a higher Test score since Ricky Ponting opened the 2006-07 Ashes series with 196 at the Gabba and for Haddin, the effort has strengthened his resolve that he must play his natural aggressive game.He and his two brothers run a fitness company and Haddin seems like he would be more comfortable with ten frenetic minutes on the speedball than an hour of sweating on the stepping machine. It’s an approach that has served him well in limited-overs cricket, where he has been considered good enough to play ODIs as a specialist batsman. It’s also a method that will bring him scrutiny at Test level, as he has discovered in his first year at the highest level.Haddin has not been terrible with the bat in his first eight Tests; although he failed to post a half-century he averaged 26.07 and that was a mark that in the pre-Gilchrist era would have been considered perfectly acceptable for the team’s gloveman. It is the style of his dismissals that brought him under the spotlight.Of the five times he was out in his debut series in the West Indies, he was caught playing attacking strokes thrice and once was lbw going for a cross-batted shot. In India his six dismissals included a mistimed drive to mid-on, a stumping when he advanced to Anil Kumble, and a catch at cover failing to pick Ishant Sharma’s slower ball. Such endings can look ugly at Test level, especially when the team needs steadiness as it did in India.By the time his first Test on home soil came around at the Gabba last week, Haddin was so nervous that he felt he was tensing up and unable to play his natural game. He began defensively and it meant that when New Zealand made the tempting bowling change to bring on the medium-pacer Jesse Ryder, Haddin’s eyes lit up and his attempted drive was edged to slip.An astute thinker on the game who has been a successful captain of New South Wales, Haddin knew the pressure was building. So when he clipped a boundary through midwicket off Tim Southee to bring up his first Test century, his excitement was understandable. Haddin swung his bat around and around, so wildly it looked like he was winding up for the hammerthrow, and a kiss of the helmet and hug from Michael Clarke completed the celebrations.The pressure was off and with his glovework also improving, Haddin was feeling at ease. He was fortunate to get to triple-figures but rarely does a batsman stroke a truly chanceless hundred. He was on 3 when he tried to hook a short ball from Chris Martin and survived the confident appeals of the New Zealanders, who thought he had nicked it behind. There were other moments of luck when balls bobbled past the stumps or were struck close to fielders, and the most obvious let-off came when Daniel Flynn dropped a sitter when Haddin chipped Daniel Vettori to mid-on when he had 72.The good fortune allowed Haddin to show his full range of strokes, something he had been unable to demonstrate before at Test level. He punched the fast bowlers for well-timed fours that raced across the expansive Adelaide Oval outfield, he used his feet to Vettori and went over the top on several occasions and when his century was safely confirmed, he let loose with a couple of sixes clubbed square off Aaron Redmond.Haddin was effective but rarely did he look like a typical Test batsman whereas his partner in a 181-run stand, Clarke, was every bit the five-day compiler. Clarke’s 110 was his fourth Test century this year and his style could not have contrasted more vividly with that of Haddin. Clarke was on 48 when Haddin came to the crease and the men reached their centuries within 14 balls of each other.The most noticeable difference was in the way they handled the indefatigable Vettori, who bowled 31.4 overs for the day. Vettori took an over-the-stumps, outside-leg line that in most situations would be viewed as defensive. To Clarke it was; he kicked the majority of the deliveries away and waited to score at the other end. To Haddin, it was a viable ploy to get him out. He was uncomfortable thrusting his pad to the ball and he could use the method for only a few balls at a time before sweeping over the top or advancing to drive.Haddin’s tactics worked on this occasion but they won’t always be successful in Test cricket. Perhaps he could learn something from the measured approach taken by Clarke, and by Michael Hussey on the second day. But maybe that’s asking Haddin to be something he is not and when a man has just made 169 in his ninth Test, it’s hard to argue against him playing his natural game. Haddin’s style of play will lead to spectacular successes and extravagant failures but if the fans and selectors appreciate him for who he is, he has every chance of leaving his own mark on the Test team.

Last man standing for West Indies

Since Lara retired following the World Cup in April last year, Chanderpaul has averaged 105 an innings in Tests, with five hundreds, and 88 in ODIs, with two

Tony Cozier14-Sep-2008
Shivnarine Chanderpaul averaged 91 in Tests and 74.75 in ODIs between August 2007 and August 2008 © DigicelCricket.coms
The distance between Shivnarine Chanderpaul and the rest in the ICC’s annual Cricketer of the Year award last week was every bit as absolute as Usain Bolt’s in the 100 metres at Beijing a fortnight earlier.Its impact on a sport, for which the West Indies once set the standards, but which has now fallen on hard times should be as equally strong as Bolt’s on athletics. It is a shining light amid the continuing gloom, an example to the coming, indeed the present, generation of what can be achieved by “the sort of dedication, bravery and skill required to excel at the highest level” as ICC president David Morgan put it in reference to Chanderpaul’s success.His stats over the relevant period (from August 2007 to August 2008) were phenomenal. His average of 91 an innings in his eight Tests against three of the strongest contemporary teams, South Africa, Sri Lanka and No.1 Australia, was 12.3 runs better than the next man, Andrew Symonds. In 13 one-dayers, his 74.75 also topped the list, more than six runs ahead of Mohammad Yousuf of Pakistan. No world record was involved and there were certainly no exuberant celebrations, even though, as a friend noted, Bolt was copying Chanderpaul’s stance in running the last 20 metres of the Olympics 100 sideways.These are two West Indians different in every way except in their pursuit of excellence – Bolt, the giant, loose-limbed, party-loving Jamaican, Chanderpaul the quiet, unassuming, “elfin” (to use Australian writer Greg Baum’s word) Guyanese.The former delights in his success and relishes the limelight; the latter celebrates his landmarks with a gentle kiss of the pitch and regards the interviewers’ microphone as a dangerous weapon to be avoided.Yet they have both stressed that hard work, commitment and love of their sport are what got them where they are. They are attributes seemingly ignored by West Indies cricketers of recent vintage, so many of whom have wasted natural ability far more apparent than Chanderpaul’s. Chanderpaul, of course, could not have maintained his record of consistency over his 14 years as an international batsman without talent. It is just that it has been honed by diligent practice, from the time his father and friends bowled at him as a frail boy, hour after hour, in the environs of their humble home in Unity Village.He has not had the benefit of academies and centres of excellence or, until this year, a contract in English county cricket. It has been based on strict self-discipline.While others are relieved when a long, hot session in the nets is over, Chanderpaul is begging for more. Even team media managers Imran Khan and Philip Spooner report they spend extra time hurling down balls to help him refine a certain shot.He is now resident in Florida, where willing Imrans and Phillips are not readily available, so he has installed a bowling machine to keep him sharp. It is such dedication that has developed his game so that he has become as adaptable as any batsman of his time.His basic method is still peculiarly his own. It is based on a quirky front-on stance from which he commits himself to safety-first strokes so late that pushes and deflections are his main run-earners. It is not pretty but, as he never tires telling the critics, it works for him. Ask the bowlers who, on four separate occasions in Tests, have taken more than 1000 minutes between innings to dismiss him. Yet, over the years, he has had the confidence and inventiveness to develop an attacking side that can strike suddenly, like Clark Kent emerging from the telephone booth as Superman. His basic method is still peculiarly his own. It is based on a quirky front-on stance from which he commits himself to safety-first strokes so late that pushes and deflections are his main run-earners. It is not pretty but, as he never tires telling the critics, it works for him. Ask the bowlers who, on four separate occasions in Tests, have taken more than 1000 minutes between innings to dismiss him The contrast can be as great as his self-centred grind for 11 hours, 25 minutes over an unbeaten 136 in Antigua in 2002 and his seven and three-quarter debut Test hundred against India at the Kensington Oval in 1997 to his hundred off 69 balls against Australia in Bourda in 2003, the fourth fastest in Test history.When someone had the bright idea of using him to open in ODIs as counter to Chris Gayle, Chanderpaul often matched his power-hitting partner run for run. They formed the West Indies’ most productive ODI first wicket pairing until someone had another bright idea and slipped Chanderpaul back down the order.Not that it has made much difference, as indicated by his ODI record, both over the ICC awards period and overall (average 40.49, strike-rate 70, 74 sixes, after 235 matches). His unforgettable four and six off Chaminda Vaas’ last two balls of the match to clinch victory over Sri Lanka at the Queen’s Park Oval last April were almost enough by themselves to have earned the ODI Player of the Year award.For much of Chanderpaul’s career, he was in the inevitable shadow of the supreme genius of Brian Lara, often his fellow left-hander’s steady partner, most famously along the way to his first Test record 375 in Antigua in 2004.He is now the last man standing from the team in which he made his debut, aged 19, against England on his home ground at Bourda in 1994. Such longevity enhances his reputation as does his response to Lara’s departure that has elevated him to the team’s one truly world-class batsman.Since Lara retired following the World Cup in April last year, Chanderpaul has averaged 105 an innings in Tests, with five hundreds, and 88 in ODIs, with two. Not since the great George Headley, “Atlas” of the 1930s, and Lara himself, has a West Indian batsman carried the batting to such an extent.Quite apart from the team’s depressing decline, Chanderpaul has not been free of personal disappointment and despair. Injuries and illnesses eliminated him from 17 Tests in the late 1990s into early 2000. Thrust into the captaincy by the acrimonious dispute between the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) and the West Indies Players Association (WIPA), he was let down by some senior players who dissed him for choosing to keep on playing rather than boycott the 2005 tour of Sri Lanka.It prompted his resignation after the New Zealand tour of 2006 but it could not destroy his love for the game or his commitment to West Indies cricket.As his exploits are acknowledged with the award of the Sir Garfield Sobers Trophy, named in honour of the finest West Indian cricketer of all, Chanderpaul has set standards for all those to follow. Xavier Marshall, Leon Johnson, Adrian Barath, Kieran Powell, Kraig Brathwaite and other up-and-comers, please copy.

Flintoff, bloody Flintoff

Four years on from his greatest moments, Andrew Flintoff was at it again with a match-winning performance

Peter English at Lord's20-Jul-2009Bloody Andrew Flintoff. Bruised, battered, triumphant Andrew Flintoff. One bad leg, another great home Test against Australia. There he is, raising his arms again in his parting-the-waters pose, leading England closer to the Ashes promised land.Minutes after the match Princess Anne was at the back of the pavilion, policemen clearing her way through the fans, but only a handful stopped to watch her pass. England cricket’s royal was on the field, spectators shouting and bouncing at his latest effort to prevent an uprising from the Dominions.He’s a man who, given the condition of his right knee, should be kept to five-over spells. Not interested, his mind says. After his fourth-ball removal of Brad Haddin, who was caught at second slip, he spoke at Andrew Strauss. “Just to let you know I’ll keep bowling until all the wickets are gone.” He did, taking 3 for 43 in ten overs and toasting himself by lunch. No weak link or cartilage here, just more tormenting of Australia.Everyone in England has 2005 tattooed on the brain, when England rode on Flintoff’s back and the visiting batsmen’s feet turned to concrete. The calendar says 2009 but perhaps time has frozen. Once again the Australians are trying to talk like they are still capable of dominating the contest; Flintoff is sitting back, lounging like he’s puffing on a cigar. He would be fun to be out with tonight.No wonder the home supporters don’t mention the excessive drinking and disappointment of 2006-07. Why stain his contribution by looking at his failures? Always look on the bright side of life, without the irony.He started with a fruity Sunday morning sermon to Phillip Hughes and finished with 5 for 92 the following day. Not the worst time for his third five-wicket haul in Tests. Despite the emotion and a twinging, throbbing knee, he is determined to make it to The Oval, bowing out with more industrial-strength noise.”I’d do anything to get out on the field and finish the series,” he said. “I bowled all my overs, I might have been in a bit of discomfort but I’ve been in discomfort most of my career. It’s encouraging I can come in and bowl as many overs as I have done, it bodes well for the last three Tests.”Strauss rated Flintoff in the top three bowlers that opposition batsmen hate to face, due to his “consistent hostility”. Ricky Ponting compared the potency of his top-class spells to those from Ambrose, Walsh and Akram, bowlers from an era few modern players can remember. Talk of Flintoff’s injury and the possibility of him not making it through the series are not being listened to by the Australians.”I think it’s rubbish,” Ponting said. “If Flintoff can bowl like that today I don’t think he’s in any danger of missing the next Test.”After taking care of both openers on the fourth day, Flintoff ended England’s fears of an Australian world record with Haddin’s edge. He followed up by bowling Nathan Hauritz and when an inswinger broke Peter Siddle’s stumps Flintoff dropped to his knee. Accepting the applause – “I milked the crowd a little bit” – he was swamped by his team-mates who hugged the air from him.On the Australian balcony there were glum, stubbled faces caused by a familiar foe. “We’ve always said that when he’s up and running and bowling as well as he can he’s as good as anyone probably going around,” Ponting said. “He gives his all. His spells have not got shorter through the game.”And Flintoff thinks he is becoming faster and smarter, the only thing hampering him being the trailing of strapping tape and pain-killers. “It’s quite sad in some ways that I feel I’m getting better as a bowler,” he said. “It’s just unfortunate I’m having to do what I’m doing with where the body’s standing up. I’m learning a bit more about bowling and how to bowl.”My length is naturally probably a little bit shorter and aggressive. Once you get the batters back, probably the full-length ball is a little bit more threatening. I’ve got an understanding of what to do, I’m going to have to apply that in the next three games.”He was talking less than an hour after the match but already his name was taped to the bowling honour board, his five wickets earning a spot six years after he made it on the batting list for a century against South Africa. That was “nice”, he said, but winning the Ashes means much more. A second grabbing of the tiny urn will be worth a retirement full of limping.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus